| |
An excellent example of
the contrived conflict is the events of 9-11.
9-11 is obviously a contrived incident. Only six
companies in the world can drop buildings the
size of the WTC into their footprints. Building 7
was pulled at the end of the day,
without any plane flying into it. We now know,
thanks to top scientist Steven Jones, of Brigham
Young University, that thermate, the
commercial grade of thermite, which
is mixed with sulfur, was used in cutter
charges to bring the buildings down in
almost a free fall speed of seconds. The thermate reaction
with the steel burned white hot for six weeks underground.
Burning aviation fuel does not get anywhere
nearly hot enough to melt steel in this way.
For his efforts to warn the nation, Jones was
released from the University employment.
9-11
Being Used to Build the Image
to the Beast
9-11
is now being used to build a totalitarian state,
the image of the beast of Revelation 13:15. In
addition, who was sitting at the reigns of power
to accomplish this? The power of the Order of
Skull and Bones, our very government.
A
Threat on the Order of Pearl Harbor
In a 1997 Council
on Foreign Relations study entitled The Grand
Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostatic
Imperatives, Brzezinski clearly showed why he
and his fellow CFR members believed it necessary
for the United States to maintain a military
presence in the Near East. [A] s America
becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it
may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus
on foreign policy issues, he wrote, except
in the circumstance of a truly massive and
widely perceived direct external threat. He
was explicit that such a threat would
need to be on the order of the one that involved
America in the last world war. The
attitude of the American public toward the
external projection of American power has been
much more ambivalent. The public
supported Americas engagement in World War
II largely because of the shock effect of the
Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Brzezinski
wrote. Jim Marrs, The Terror Conspiracy:
Deception, 9/11, and the Loss of Liberty.
New York: Disinformation, 2006, p. 181. (Emphasis
mine)
Gestapo Intercepted
Conversation Between Churchill and Roosevelt
Eleven Days Before Pearl Harbor
Of course, Roosevelt knew
in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbor. In 1948,
the interrogation of Germanys Gestapo Chief
Heinrich Mueller, based on secret files, revealed
that Germans in Holland, on November 26, 1941,
eleven days before Pearl Harbor, intercepted a
private, trans-Atlantic telephone conversation
between Roosevelt and Churchill, in which
Churchill informed Roosevelt of the coming attack,
based on specific agents within the Japanese
military and foreign service, as well as their
broken code.
Roosevelt: A
Japanese Attack On Us
Would Fulfill Two of
the Most Important Requirements of Our Policy
Churchill
stated, I can assure you that their goal is
the (conversation broken) fleet in Hawaii, at
Pearl Harbor. After finding out the nature
of the intelligence, Roosevelt responded, The
obvious implication is that the Japs are going to
do a Port Arthur on us at Pearl Harbor. Do you
concur? Later in the conversation Roosevelt said,
A Japanese attack on us, which would result
in war between-and certainly you as well would
certainly fulfill two of the most important
requirements of our policy. Jim
Marrs, Terror Conspiracy, pp.
355, 356.
____________________
|